Journal of the Neurological Sciences

BackgroundChronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION) is a steroid-dependent form of optic neuritis with incompletely understood pathophysiology. The identification of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies (MOG-IgG) in a substantial patient subset has challenged the diagnostic and therapeutic management. The aim of this study was to investigate clinical profiles and treatment outcomes of patients with CRION, comparing MOG-IgG-positive (MOG+) and seronegative (MOG-) subgroups. MethodsPatients from six European tertiary centers fulfilling diagnostic criteria for CRION were included. All underwent cell-based autoantibody testing. Clinical outcomes (visual acuity, annualized relapse rate), laboratory and imaging findings (MRI, OCT), and treatment responses were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsSixty patients were included (median age 33 years; 70% female); 27 (45%) were MOG+. MOG+ CRION was associated with later onset, higher ARR before treatment (median [IQR] 2 [1-3] vs. 1 [1-2], p = 0.023), and a trend toward shorter inter-relapse intervals. Additional distinguishing features included higher frequencies of antinuclear antibody positivity, elevated CSF interleukin-6, and extensive optic neuritis on MRI. Relapse burden correlated with visual acuity decline and retinal thinning. In MOG+ patients, monoclonal antibody therapy reduced the ARR (n = 21; 2 [1-3] vs. 0 [0-2], p = 0.024), primarily driven by tocilizumab (n = 11; 2 [1-3] vs. 0 [0-1], p = 0.023). In MOG-patients, rituximab and azathioprine showed a trend toward ARR reduction. ConclusionCRION represents a heterogeneous syndrome encompassing distinct subgroups. MOG+ patients demonstrate higher disease activity but respond favorably to tocilizumab. Serological testing is critical for treatment stratification and preventing relapses.

Objective: To assess ethnic disparities in time to hospital presentation, use of acute reperfusion therapies, and in-hospital treatment times among patients presenting with stroke in a Dutch emergency department. Methods: In this single-centre observational cohort study, we included patients with a first-ever ischemic stroke between September 2020 and September 2021. Patients were categorized by ethnicity (with or without migration background). Demographic and stroke characteristics were compared between groups. Outcomes included: rates of presentation outside therapeutic time window, acute reperfusion therapy (intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT)), and, when applicable, door-to-treatment time (DTTT), with a door-to-needle time (DTNT) and door-to-groin time (DTGT) for IVT and EVT respectively. Univariable and multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for age, sex, and NIHSS at presentation, where appropriate. Results: A total of 232 patients were included, of whom 62 (26.7%) had a migration background. These patients were younger (66.6 vs 71.2 years) and more frequently had diabetes (27.4% vs 15.9%). Sex distribution was similar (59.7% vs 60.6% male). Stroke etiology differed between groups with less cardio-embolism (4.8% vs 15.3%) and more small vessel disease (69.4% vs 48.2%) among patients with a migration background. These latter patients presented more often outside the therapeutic time window (53.2% vs 37.1%; OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.05-3.45). EVT was less frequently performed in patients with a migration background compared to those without (8.1% vs 22.4%; OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.75). There were no significant differences in treatment times (DTTT 38min vs 30min, DTNT 35min vs 26min, DTGT 64min vs 54min). Conclusion: Patients with a migration background were more likely to present outside the therapeutic time window and had a lower rate of EVT. In order to improve access for these patients, more insight into prehospital and within hospital barriers and facilitators for appropriate management are needed.

BackgroundAccelerated long-term forgetting (ALF), defined as an increased rate of memory loss over extended intervals, has so far been detected in a pilot study of patients with mild multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to (I) confirm the presence of ALF in a larger, heterogeneous MS sample, (II) explore associations with patient-reported outcomes, and (III) assess the diagnostic performance of ALF tests for subjective memory impairment. MethodsThis study compared 62 MS patients and 65 age-, sex-, and education-matched healthy controls using standardized memory tests (RAVLT, WMS-IV Logical Memory subtest). Recall was assessed immediately, after 30 minutes, and after 7 days. Seven-day/30-minute recall ratios (QRAVLT, QWMS) served as primary outcomes. Self-report measures included memory complaints, fatigue, depression, and sleep disturbances. Linear regression and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed predictors and diagnostic accuracy. ResultsALF was observed in multiple sclerosis since QRAVLT was lower in patients than in controls (0.64 [95% CI 0.59-0.69] vs. 0.78 [0.73-0.82], p < 0.001), as was QWMS (0.79 [95% CI 0.74-0.84] vs. 0.95 [0.90-1.00], p < 0.001), despite comparable initial learning. Greater fatigue, higher memory complaints, longer disease duration, older age, and greater disability were associated with lower ALF scores. The combined ALF score moderately discriminated subjective memory impairment (AUC 0.74; sensitivity 0.73; specificity 0.73). ConclusionMS patients showed ALF despite normal initial learning, indicating a specific memory deficit undetected by standard tests. Long-delay recall using RAVLT and WMS-IV Logical Memory subtest may improve cognitive impairment detection in MS.

ObjectiveTo describe the design, feasibility, and baseline characteristics of the Migraine Impact on Neurocognitive Dynamics (MIND) study, a 30-day smartphone-based cohort for high-frequency assessment of cognition and symptoms in adults with migraine. BackgroundCognitive symptoms are an important component of migraine burden, but they are difficult to measure using single-visit testing or retrospective questionnaires. Repeated smartphone-based assessment may better capture real-world variability in cognition and symptoms. MethodsAdults meeting International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, criteria for migraine were enrolled remotely and completed 30 days of once-daily ecological momentary assessments and mobile cognitive tasks delivered through the Mobile Monitoring of Cognitive Change platform. Baseline measures assessed demographics, migraine characteristics, disability, mood, stress, and treatment patterns. Feasibility was evaluated using enrollment, completion, and retention metrics. ResultsA total of 177 participants enrolled (mean age 38.8 {+/-} 11.9 years; 79.7% female), including 80/177 (45.2%) with chronic migraine. Across the 30-day protocol, 3688 daily assessments were completed, representing 70.8% of all possible study days, and 70.6% of participants completed at least 20 days of monitoring. Completion remained above 60% across study days. At baseline, chronic migraine was associated with greater burden than low-frequency and high-frequency episodic migraine, including higher MIDAS scores (98.6 vs. 38.7 and 70.3), more days with concentration difficulty (16.0 vs. 7.9 and 11.5), and more days with functional interference (18.5 vs. 7.6 and 13.0). ConclusionsThe MIND study demonstrates the feasibility of high-frequency smartphone-based assessment of cognition and symptoms in migraine and provides a methodological foundation for future analyses of within-person cognitive and symptom dynamics across the migraine cycle.

Abstract Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains a significant cause of disability worldwide. Current treatments, primarily intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), are limited by narrow time windows and reperfusion injury, leading to suboptimal outcomes for many patients. Chuanzhi Tongluo (CZTL), a traditional Chinese medicine, has been preliminarily recognized as a novel cerebral protection agent in animal models. Objectives: This trial investigates the efficacy and safety of CZTL capsule in patients with AIS who are not eligible for IVT or who experience early neurological deterioration after IVT. Methods and design: The CONCERN trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-control, randomized clinical study in China. An estimated 1,208 eligible participants will be consecutively randomized to receive CZTL capsule therapy or placebo in 1:1 ratio across approximately 70 stroke centers in China. All enrolled patients are orally administered 2 capsules of CZTL or placebo 3 times a day together with antiplatelet agents for 3 months. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is an excellent functional outcome, defined as a score of 0 or 1 on the mRS at 90 days. Lead safety endpoints included 90-day mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours. Conclusions: Results of CONCERN trial will determine the clinical efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese medicine CZTL capsule in the treatment of AIS patients. Trial registry number: ChiCTR2300074147 (www.chictr.org.cn).

Abstract Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of bridging intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) versus direct EVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated within the 6- to 24-hour time window. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospective EVT registry from 10 comprehensive stroke centers in China and Singapore between 2019 and 2024. Eligible patients had anterior circulation LVO, underwent EVT within 6-24 hours of onset, had ASPECTS 6, NIHSS 6, and pre-stroke mRS 2. Patients were stratified into bridging IVT + EVT (IVT group) versus direct EVT alone (non-IVT group). Propensity score matching (1:2 ratio) was performed to balance baseline covariates. The primary outcome was 3-month favorable functional outcome (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes included successful recanalization (mTICI 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and 3-month mortality. In the matched cohort, binary outcomes were compared using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Results: Of 772 included patients, 110 (14.2%) received bridging IVT and 662 (85.8%) received direct EVT. After propensity score matching, 202 non-IVT patients were matched to 101 IVT patients, with all covariates well-balanced (absolute SMD <0.10). In the matched cohort, bridging IVT was not associated with a significant difference in 3-month favorable outcome (44.55% vs. 47.03%; common OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.56-1.46), successful recanalization (91.09% vs. 90.10%; OR 1.11; 0.51-2.44), sICH (5.94% vs. 9.41%; OR 0.61; 0.24-1.58), HT (23.76% vs. 23.27%; OR 1.03; 0.57-1.85), or 3-month mortality (15.84% vs. 13.37%; OR 1.22; 0.62-2.37). Conclusion: In this large multicenter propensity score-matched analysis, bridging intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy in the 6- to 24-hour time window was not significantly associated with improved efficacy or increased safety risks compared with direct endovascular therapy alone.

This research demonstrates that the trans-aqueduct approach is a feasible, minimally invasive access pathway to the third ventricle, offering a potential route to the deep brain for therapeutic technologies. Further pre-clinical investigation is required to thoroughly evaluate physiological tolerance, trauma risk, and the long-term implications of intraventricular implantation. The third ventricle is a high-value site for neuromodulation due to its proximity to deep-brain targets, including the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi). This study defined the anatomical pathway; and evaluated the technical feasibility of retrograde access to the third ventricle via the cerebral aqueduct using minimally invasive interventional techniques. Evaluation was conducted in three phases using human MRI datasets (n=16; mean age 48.4 years) and cadaveric specimens (n=6; mean age 88.2 years). Phase 1 involved morphometric MRI analysis of the aqueduct and ventricles. Phase 2 tested trans-aqueduct access on cadaver specimens via fluoroscopically guided guidewires and catheters. Phase 3 utilized direct anatomical dissections on cadaver specimens (n=3) to morphometrically measure the third ventricular cavity and its relationship to deep-brain nuclei. Measurements across the sample groups showed a mean aqueduct diameter of 1.6 mm (SD=0.14). Third ventricle dimensions averaged 27.6 mm (ventral-dorsal), 19.9 mm (caudal-cranial), and 5.7 mm (lateral). Successful access to the third ventricle was achieved in 83% (5/6) of cadaveric specimens. The optimal technical configuration utilized a 0.018'' angled-tip guidewire and 5-6 Fr catheters; the aqueduct accommodated diameters up to 2.0 mm with minimal resistance. The STN and GPi were localized within 5-20 mm of the ventricular volumetric centroid. The trans-aqueduct approach is a technically feasible, minimally invasive pathway for accessing the third ventricle. This route offers a potential alternative for the delivery of therapeutic neurotechnologies. Further research is required to assess physiological tolerance, trauma risk, and the long-term safety of intraventricular implantation.

BackgroundAlthough neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH) is a common and debilitating feature of multiple system atrophy (MSA), little is known about the burden of symptoms in the real world. ObjectivesTo design and conduct a cross-sectional community-based research survey targeting patients with MSA, with and without nOH. MethodsWe recruited patients with MSA to complete an anonymous online survey covering three core themes: 1) timely diagnosis, 2) nOH pharmacotherapy and refractory symptoms, and 3) confidence in physician knowledge. Responses were grouped by pre-specified diagnostic certainty levels. Relationships between symptoms, function, and pharmacotherapy were assessed using univariate and multivariate methods. ResultsWe analyzed 259 respondents with a self-reported diagnosis of MSA (age: M=64.38, SD=8.09 years; 44% female). In total, 42% also had a diagnosis nOH; 40% had symptoms highly suspicious of nOH, but no diagnosis; and 21% reported having never had their blood pressure measured in the standing position at a clinical visit. Treatment with a pressor agent was independently associated with the presence of other symptoms of autonomic failure. Each additional nOH symptom reported increased the odds of requiring pharmacotherapy by 18%. Yet, despite anti-hypotensive medication use, 97% of patients reported limitations in their ability to bathe, cook, or arise from a chair/bed with 76% needing caregiver support for refractory nOH symptoms. ConclusionsThis cross-sectional representative sample shows nOH is underrecognized and undertreated in MSA patients, leading to substantial functional limitations. It is our hope that these findings are leveraged for planning future trials and advocating for better treatments.

Background: Current medical large language model (LLM) evaluations largely rely on small collections of cases, whereas rigorous safety testing requires large-scale, diverse, and complex cases with verifiable ground truth. Multiple Sclerosis (MS) provides an ideal evaluation model, with validated diagnostic criteria and numerous paraclinical tests informing differential diagnosis, investigation, and management. Methods: We generated synthetic MS cases with ground-truth labels for diagnosis, localisation, and management. Four frontier LLMs (Gemini 3 Pro/Flash, GPT 5.2/5 mini) were instructed to analyse cases to provide anatomical localisation, differential diagnoses, investigations, and management plans. An automated evaluator compared these outputs to the ground-truth labels. Blinded subspecialty experts validated 70 cases for realism and automated evaluator accuracy. We then evaluated LLM decision-making across 1,000 cases and scaled to 10,000 to characterise rare, catastrophic failures. Results: Subspecialist expert review confirmed 100% synthetic case realism and 99.8% (95% CI 95.5 to 100) automated evaluation accuracy. Across 1,000 generated MS cases, all LLMs successfully included MS in the differential diagnoses for more than 91% cases. However, diagnostic competence did not associate with treatment safety. Gemini 3 models had low rates of clinically appropriate steroid recommendations (Flash: 7.2% 95% CI 5.6 to 8.8; Pro: 15.8% 95% CI 13.6 to 18.1) compared to GPT 5 mini (23.5% 95% CI 20.8 to 26.1), frequently overlooking contraindications like active infection. OpenAI models inappropriately recommended acute intravenous thrombolysis for MS cases (9.6% GPT 5.2; 6.4% GPT 5 mini) compared to below 1% for Gemini models. Expanded evaluation (to 10,000 cases) probed these errors in detail. Thrombolysis was recommended in 10.1% of cases lacking symptom timing information and paradoxically persisted (2.9%) even when symptoms were explicitly documented as more than 14 days old. Conclusion: Automated expert-level evaluation across 10,000 cases characterised artificial intelligence clinical blind spots hitherto invisible to small-scale testing. Massive-scale simulation and automated interrogation should become standard for uncovering serious failures and implementing safety guardrails before clinical deployment exposes patients to risk.

Background: Rett Syndrome (RTT) is a severe neurodevelopmental disorder affecting approximately 1 in 10,000 live female births worldwide. The Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ), remains one of the most widely used standardized behavioral assessment tools for RTT. However, the RSBQ was originally validated only in British English, limiting its applicability for Spanish-speaking caregivers and clinical centers across Latin America and Spain. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to develop and validate the comprehension of the Spanish translation of the RSBQ to ensure cultural and linguistic equivalence, enhance data reliability, and facilitate earlier, more accurate clinical assessments among Spanish-speaking RTT populations. Methods: Surveys were administered in two phases to Spanish-speaking caregivers between November 2023 and September 2025. Phase I consisted of 12 guided survey administrations with participants being able to ask clarifying questions and offer linguistic modifications of RSBQ questions. Phase II consisted of independent online administration of the refined Spanish RSBQ and a retest at least 7 days later. Participants were recruited through direct outreach and supported virtually during questionnaire completion. Results: Following data cleaning and quality control, a total of 51 caregivers successfully completed both surveys. The Spanish RSBQ demonstrated high caregiver comprehension and strong engagement across multiple Latin American countries, including Argentina, Mexico, and Peru. Responses were highly correlated between test and retest timepoints, and no question showed biased response distributions. A slight effect of response interval on test-retest correlation was observed, potentially indicating the impact of natural disease progression confounding retest evaluation for long (>80 day) intervals; however this effect did not impact the overall linguistic validation results as analysis of only <21 day test-retest responders confirmed the findings. Conclusions: This linguistic validation study represents the first formal step toward the clinical validation of the Spanish RSBQ, enabling broader inclusion of Spanish-speaking populations in RTT research. The collaborative, bilingual data collection strategy proved both feasible and effective, paving the way for multinational trials and expanding therapeutic accessibility through localized, patient-centered innovation.

BackgroundTheory of Mind (ToM) deficits are well-documented in right-hemisphere stroke but remain understudied in post-stroke aphasia. Prior work suggests that performance on tasks assessing ToM may be relatively preserved in aphasia and dissociable from language impairment, but these findings are based largely on small studies. This study examined performance on nonverbal false-belief tasks in post-stroke aphasia, its relationship with aphasia severity, and whether vascular brain health, operationalized using cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) markers, contributed to variability in performance. MethodsForty-four individuals with aphasia completed two nonverbal belief-reasoning tasks assessing spontaneous perspective-taking and self-perspective inhibition. Task accuracy served as the primary outcome. Linear regression models examined associations between task performance, aphasia severity (Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient), and CSVD markers, including white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, lacunes and enlarged perivascular spaces in the basal ganglia and centrum semiovale. ResultsPerformance was heterogeneous across tasks, with reduced performance observed in 23% of participants on the Reality-Unknown task and 36% on the Reality-Known task. Aphasia severity was not associated with task accuracy. Greater cerebral microbleed count was associated with lower accuracy on both tasks, while greater basal ganglia enlarged perivascular spaces burden showed a more selective association with lower performance. ConclusionsPerformance on nonverbal false-belief tasks in aphasia is variable and not explained by aphasia severity alone. These findings suggest that apparent ToM-related difficulties in aphasia may be shaped by broader vascular brain health, supporting a more multidimensional framework for interpreting social-cognitive task performance after stroke.

Background: Cognitive impairment poses a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide, impacting patient autonomy, social participation, and quality of life, while placing a considerable burden on caregivers. Non pharmacological interventions, particularly cognitive training and non invasive brain stimulation, have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies. Objective: This study aims to quantify the synergistic effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with cognitive training on cognitive function across a spectrum of pathologies that induce cognitive impairment. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed for randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of combined tDCS and cognitive training compared with cognitive training alone. The analysis was based on the GRADE framework for systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Results: Across 27 studies including 1,012 participants, tDCS combined with cognitive training showed a small effect compared with cognitive training alone (SMD = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.15 0.56). The effect was found only immediately after the intervention and declined during follow-up. Conclusion: tDCS combined with cognitive training may provide a small, short term benefit for cognitive function, but high heterogeneity across studies and loss of effect at follow up underscore the need for larger, better standardized trials to clarify its clinical value.

Background: Depression is associated with an increased risk of subsequent Parkinson's disease. Neuroimaging studies suggest a neurobiological overlap in mechanisms underlying Parkinson's disease and psychomotor retardation in depression. Our aim was to investigate whether, among individuals with depression, the presence of psychomotor retardation was associated with the development of subsequent Parkinson's disease. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, electronic healthcare records from individuals diagnosed with depression at age 40 or over in a large mental health service in London, UK were examined for the presence of psychomotor retardation. Linkage to general hospital records was used to ascertain diagnoses of Parkinson's disease between 2007 and 2023. Cox regression was used to compare the hazard of Parkinson's disease in individuals with depression with and without psychomotor retardation. Results: Among 6327 patients with depression, 2402 (38.0%) had psychomotor retardation. The adjusted hazard ratio for development of Parkinson's in those with psychomotor retardation was 1.43 (95% CI 1.02 - 2.01, p = 0.04). Secondary analyses demonstrated a significant difference in psychomotor retardation incidence at least 10 years before Parkinson's diagnosis. Conclusions: Psychomotor retardation in later-life depression is associated with increased risk of subsequent Parkinson's diagnosis over an extended period of time, suggesting that the relationship cannot solely be explained by misdiagnosis. Psychomotor retardation may therefore serve as a marker of prodromal Parkinson's disease.

Disability worsening is the critical long-term outcome in multiple sclerosis, yet the Expanded Disability Status Scale incompletely captures neurological deterioration and has limited sensitivity in the short time windows of clinical trials. Composite endpoints incorporating functional measures have been proposed to address these limitations, but whether they reliably improve detection of treatment effects has not been established across trials. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of individual patient data from ten phase III randomised controlled trials (ASCEND, BRAVO, CONFIRM, DEFINE, EXPAND, INFORMS, OLYMPUS, OPERA I/II, and ORATORIO; n = 9,369), spanning relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis. Confirmed disability worsening was defined using harmonised criteria with the msprog package and confirmed at 24 weeks. Treatment effects were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models and combined across trials in a one-stage individual patient data framework. Composite endpoints were constructed from the Expanded Disability Status Scale, the timed 25-foot walk test, and the nine-hole peg test using logical unions (OR-type), intersections (AND-type), and majority-vote structures. Sensitivity to treatment effect was quantified using Z-scores (the ratio of the pooled log-hazard ratio to its standard error) and compared to the Expanded Disability Status Scale reference using interaction tests. Event rates varied across components: the timed walk test generated the highest rates (up to 46.8%) while the nine-hole peg test generated the lowest (as low as 2.1%). OR-type composite endpoints showed weaker treatment effects than the Expanded Disability Status Scale alone, with the largest reductions in sensitivity observed for endpoints incorporating the timed walk test ({Delta}Z up to +2.26; interaction p = 0.004). These findings were confirmed across disease subtypes and were pronounced in relapsing-remitting trials, where no composite endpoint outperformed the Expanded Disability Status Scale. In progressive multiple sclerosis, the combination of the Expanded Disability Status Scale and the nine-hole peg test showed numerically stronger treatment effects ({Delta}Z = -1.65), though interaction tests did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.051). Composite endpoints do not systematically improve treatment effect detection in multiple sclerosis trials. Increased event capture driven by the timed walk test introduces noise that dilutes the treatment signal rather than amplifying it, highlighting that event rate and endpoint quality are not interchangeable. Upper limb function assessed by the nine-hole peg test provides complementary and specific information, particularly in progressive disease. The combination of global disability and upper limb measures represents a promising direction for future endpoint development in progressive multiple sclerosis trials, warranting validation.

Introduction Despite the proven benefits of reperfusion therapies in acute ischemic stroke, treatment decisions in the hyperacute phase remain complex and are rarely supported by individualized outcome predictions. Artificial intelligence (AI)-based clinical decision support systems (CDSS) offer potential real-time prognostic estimates, but prospective evidence of their feasibility and performance in routine clinical workflows is limited. Our aim is to prospectively evaluate real-time feasibility, usability, and predictive performance of an AI-based CDSS (VALIDATE-CDSS) for individualized outcome prediction in acute stroke care. Methods and analysis Prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolling consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting to three tertiary stroke centers. Clinical management will follow standard practice at the discretion of treating physicians. In parallel, a dedicated researcher will collect patient data in real time and input them into the VALIDATE-CDSS using a mobile application, operating in shadow mode without influencing clinical decisions. The system will generate individualized predictions of 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) for four treatment strategies (intravenous thrombolysis, endovascular thrombectomy, combined therapy, or no reperfusion) at three sequential time points: baseline clinical data, non-contrast CT, and CT angiography. The primary outcome is the real-world feasibility and usability of the VALIDATE-CDSS in the hyperacute stroke workflow. Secondary outcomes include predictive performance, agreement between model-suggested and actual treatments, incremental value with increasing data availability, and assessment of potential bias across predefined subgroups. This study will provide prospective real-world evidence on the implementation and clinical potential of AI-based decision support for personalized treatment selection in acute ischemic stroke Ethics and dissemination Patient enrollment began after approval from the ethics committees of all participating centers. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed open-access journals and conference presentations. Following open science principles, anonymized data and metadata will be made publicly available in the Zenodo repository upon study completion. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05622539).

Background Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder with substantial heterogeneity in clinical presentation and progression, complicating prognosis and trial design. Neuroimaging offers objective biomarkers to track disease evolution, yet variability in progression patterns remains poorly understood. Objective To identify biologically meaningful FRDA progression subtypes using longitudinal multimodal MRI and assess their associations with demographic, genetic, and clinical factors. Methods Longitudinal structural and diffusion MRI data from 54 FRDA and 57 controls were analysed. Annualised progression rates of macrostructural (volumetric) and microstructural (diffusion) features across cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord regions were clustered using Gaussian Mixture Models. Cluster robustness was assessed using per-cluster Jaccard similarity and other validation metrics. Random Forest classification examined predictors of cluster membership. Results Three reproducible clusters/subtypes emerged: micro-dominant/dual progression, characterised by widespread microstructural deterioration with modest volumetric decline; macro-dominant, marked by pronounced volumetric decline with minimal microstructural change; and minimal/no progression, showing negligible change in all measures. FRDA participants predominated in the first two clusters. Random Forest prediction of cluster membership using clinical and demographic variables identified length of the trinucleotide repeat expansion in the FXN gene as key predictor. Conclusions Data-driven clustering of longitudinal MRI identified distinct FRDA subtypes with unique co-progression patterns, underscoring genetic burden as a key driver. Recognising such heterogeneity can improve patient stratification, enable personalised monitoring, and guide targeted therapeutic strategies. Future studies should validate these subtypes in larger, more diverse cohorts and integrate additional biomarkers for enhanced precision.

Purpose: Limited CNS bioavailability and pharmacodynamics are obstacles to effective systemic therapies for glioblastoma. One strategy to overcome these challenges is drug combinations enhancing CNS penetration and/or tumor chemosensitivity. LP-184, a synthetic acylfulvene class alkylator, induces DNA damage and inhibits glioblastoma cell viability in pre-clinical models. LP-184 is a prodrug converted to active metabolites by intracellular prostaglandin reductase 1 (PTGR1) that is over-expressed in >70% of glioblastoma. DNA damage induced by LP-184 is MGMT agnostic and reversed by transcription-dependent NER. Patients: LP-184 was evaluated in a Phase 1a study (NCT05933265) in 63 adult patients with advanced malignancies including 16 patients with recurrent glioblastoma. All patients with glioblastoma received prior standard-of-care therapy and most had received 1 or more additional therapies before enrollment. Results: Patients with glioblastoma experienced more frequent transaminitis, Grade 1-2 nausea and a trend towards more frequent and severe thrombocytopenia compared to the non-glioblastoma cohort. Otherwise, overall toxicity profiles were similar. Clinical pharmacokinetic analysis combined with published pre-clinical intra-tumoral bioavailability data (~20% penetration) predicted that LP-184 at the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) would achieve cytotoxic levels if combined with spironolactone, a BBB permeable ERCC3 degrader and TC-NER inhibitor that sensitizes glioblastoma cells to LP-184 3-6-fold. We show that three daily doses of spironolactone deplete orthotopic glioblastoma PDX ERCC3 protein by ~ 80% and increases tumor LP-184 cytotoxicity 2-fold. Conclusions: LP-184 is well tolerated at the RDE, and we establish a clinically translatable scheme for dosing spironolactone in combination with LP-184 for a future Phase 1b clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) represent a major advancement in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), offering high response rates even in heavily pretreated patients. However, their use presents operational, safety, and supportive care complexities that require coordinated care teams, and evolving infrastructure. This manuscript summarizes best practice recommendations for adverse event (AE) management, outpatient operational models, referral pathways, and emerging strategies to optimize long-term tolerability. METHODS: Medlive, A PlatformQ Health Brand, conducted qualitative interviews of academic and community-based clinicians. Discussions focused on BsAb implementation, patient selection and counseling, and AE management. Experts provided recommendations on team-based protocols, transitions of care, and inpatient versus outpatient considerations. RESULTS: Ten hematologists/oncologists (academic n=4; community n=6) described practice patterns, barriers, and perspectives on BsAb use. BsAbs were consistently regarded as highly effective across multiple lines of therapy, particularly for patients without alternatives. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was the most common acute toxicity, generally low grade and managed effectively with early tocilizumab, including prophylactic use in outpatient settings. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was rare, mild, and best mitigated through early recognition and caregiver support. Infections, largely from BCMA-associated hypogammaglobulinemia, frequently interrupted therapy, necessitating antiviral prophylaxis, pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Outpatient step-up dosing is expanding, supported by prophylactic strategies and academic-community collaboration. Timely referral was emphasized to preserving eligibility. Major outpatient challenges included sequencing, infrastructure readiness, and standardized caregiver and staff education. CONCLUSION: Effective community implementation of BsAbs requires multidisciplinary coordination, standardized AE protocols, infection prevention, and infrastructure to support monitoring, referrals, and equitable access. These measures are critical to ensure safe, sustainable integration of bispecific therapies and to optimize patient outcomes.

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of the -synuclein seed amplification assay (SAA) and characterize the impact of -synuclein co-pathology on cognitive and biological profiles in routine clinical practice. Methods: We included 398 patients from the prospective multicenter ALZAN cohort recruited from memory clinics in Montpellier, Nimes, and Perpignan. All participants underwent CSF and blood sampling with measurement of CSF biomarkers (A{beta}42/40, tau, ptau181) and plasma biomarkers (A{beta}42/40, ptau181, ptau217, GFAP, NfL). Cognitive assessment was performed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Clinical diagnoses were independently confirmed by two senior neurologists. Syn status was determined by SAA (RT-QuIC). Results: Of 398 patients, 19 out of 20 patients with Lewy body dementia (LBD) (95.0%) and 32 out of 203 patients with AD (15.8%) were SAA+. SAA-positivity presented a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 93.5% for distinguishing LBD from patients without LBD or AD. In the entire cohort, SAA+ patients showed lower MMSE scores (p<0.01), lower CSF A{beta}42/40 ratio (p<0.01), and elevated plasma GFAP (p<0.05). Within the AD group, no significant differences in CSF or blood biomarkers were observed between SAA+ and SAA- patients. Within the AD subgroup, no significant differences in CSF or blood biomarkers were observed between SAA+ and SAA- patients, except for a lower CSF A{beta}42/40 ratio in SAA+ patients (p<0.01). Interpretation: SAA demonstrates good diagnostic capabilities for detecting LBD and confirms notable Syn co-pathology in AD. This study highlights the limitations of routine CSF and emerging blood biomarkers in capturing Syn pathology and the value of integrating SAA into routine neurodegenerative disease assessment.

ImportanceMigraine attacks often occur unpredictably, limiting the ability of individuals to initiate timely preventive or preemptive treatment. Short-term probabilistic forecasting of migraine risk could enable more targeted management strategies. ObjectiveTo externally validate the previously developed Headache Prediction Model (HAPRED-I), evaluate an updated continuously learning model (HAPRED-II), and assess the feasibility and short-term safety of delivering individualized probabilistic migraine forecasts directly to patients. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsProspective 8-week cohort study conducted remotely at two academic medical centers in the United States (Massachusetts General Hospital and Wake Forest Health Sciences) between 2015 and 2019. Adults with recurrent migraine or tension-type headache completed twice-daily electronic diaries. A total of 230 participants contributed 23,335 diary entries across 11,862 participant-days of observation. Main Outcomes and MeasuresOccurrence of a headache attack within 24 hours following each evening diary entry. Model performance was evaluated using discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) and calibration. ResultsExternal validation of HAPRED-I demonstrated modest discrimination (AUC, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.57-0.61) and poor calibration, with predicted probabilities consistently exceeding observed headache risk. In contrast, the continuously updating HAPRED-II model demonstrated progressive improvement in predictive performance as participant-specific data accumulated. Discrimination increased from an AUC of 0.59 (95% CI, 0.57-0.61) during the first 14 days to 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.70) after the first month, accompanied by improved calibration across predicted risk levels. Over the study period, 6999 individualized forecasts were delivered directly to participants. No evidence suggested that receipt of forecasts was associated with increasing headache frequency or worsening predicted headache risk trajectories. Conclusions and RelevanceA static migraine forecasting model demonstrated limited transportability to new individuals. In contrast, models that continuously update within individuals may improve predictive accuracy over time and enable real-time delivery of personalized migraine risk forecasts. Further work incorporating richer physiologic and contextual predictors will likely be necessary before such systems can reliably guide clinical treatment decisions.